Understanding uncertainty in ANACONDA results due to small numbers of deaths: Guidance for users

This document provides guidance to ANACONDA users to help inform decisions on the appropriate number of deaths necessary to have confidence in ANACONDA results for a population or sub-population.

Document

This resource appears in the following collections.

CRVS Best-Practice and Advocacy

CRVS best-practice and advocacy resources are based on a combination of technical knowledge, country experiences and scientific literature. These resources are intended to stimulate debate and ideas for in-country CRVS policy, planning, and capacity building, and promote the adoption of best...

Created
Updated
Citation

Adiar, T. Understanding uncertainty in ANACONDA results due to small numbers of deaths: Guidance for users. CRVS best-practice and advocacy. Melbourne, Australia: Bloomberg Philanthropies Data for Health Initiative, Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Improvement, University of Melbourne; 2020.

Domains
Civil Registration and Vital Statistics
Resource Type
Report
Topics
ANACONDA
application of tools
guidance
Language
English
* indicates required